DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
o. NR -14
24 Mar Lo
This is in reference to your f your
A three-member panel
sitting in executive
24 March 2015. Your
ccordance with administr
le to the proceedings
onsidered by the See cons*s
considered th aaGES opinion QO Ser
812/0021 dated 21 January 2015, red
is evidence not previously conside
decision in your case. In j
mind that a presumption of
Docket No. NR7902-14
of an official naval
Consequently, when applying for a correction
nstrate the existence of
record, the burden is on the applicant to demo
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
MI-HAY 7
J lw Mae”
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: NPC memo 1430 Ser B12/0021 dtd 21 Jan 15
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7386 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8685 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8773 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7250 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered’ your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR7250-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of 7 probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11287 14
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0194 dated 4 March 2015 and CNRFC letter 5420 Ser N1/0562 dated 16 May 2014, copies of which are attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR11287-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7189 14
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0151 dated 5 February 2015, a copy of which was provided to you on 7 February 2015, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR058 15
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NKOO58-15 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3218 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application cn 9 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3471 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR COR! TION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket ! NR32471-14 24 Maz E This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 A three-member panel of g in executive ses c 5 Your all rdance with admini oO e Yy considere ri y Lon 1 shed by OCNO memo N130C2/15U1 i ( ry 2015 copy of which iis ee Arter ana conscientious considerati Che ¢€ re recora C...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11217 14
NR11217-14 1 May 15 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 1000 Ser M1/15UM10016 dated 25 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR11217-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...